STAND AGAINST
SQ 836
State Question 836 would fundamentally alter Oklahoma's election system by eliminating party primaries. As Oklahoma voters, we understand the importance of maintaining a clear, transparent electoral process that serves our state. Join us in opposing this measure that would create confusion and undermine our democratic traditions.
WHY OKLAHOMANS OPPOSE SQ 836
Key concerns from voters across the state:
- •Eliminates the traditional primary system that has served Oklahoma for decades
- •Creates potential for general election ballots with two democrats and no republicans or independents
- •Increases complexity in the electoral process for both voters and candidates
- •Lacks proven track record of improving electoral outcomes in other states
CONCERNS WITH THE PROPOSED SYSTEM:
- •Voter confusion: Consolidating all candidates onto a single primary ballot may reduce clarity for voters
- •Reduced representation: General elections could feature candidates from only one party, limiting voter options
- •Party accountability: Weakens the ability of political organizations to support candidates aligned with their platforms
- •Campaign costs: Extended campaign periods may favor well-funded candidates over grassroots campaigns
LEARN MORE: EXPERT ANALYSIS
Read what policy experts, journalists, and elected officials are saying about SQ 836
SQ 836 Would Import California's Voting System
OCPA Think Tank - Analysis
Detailed analysis of how SQ 836 would import California's problematic voting system and thwart Oklahoma conservatives.
California-Style Primary Still a Bad Idea
OCPA Think Tank - Press Release
OCPA's official statement on why California-style primaries remain a bad idea for Oklahoma voters.
SQ 836 Would Corrupt Oklahoma's Election System
The Oklahoman - Opinion by James Greiner
Guest column explaining how State Question 836 would fundamentally corrupt Oklahoma's election system.
Oklahoma's State Question 836 is Not OK
Southwest Ledger - Editorial
Editorial board's perspective on why State Question 836 is wrong for Oklahoma.
Don't Sing S.Q. 836 – A Fair Analysis
CapitolBeatOK - Steve Fair Commentary
Fair and balanced analysis of State Question 836 and its implications for Oklahoma voters.
State Question 836 Divides and Dilutes!
CapitolBeatOK
Analysis of how SQ 836 would divide and dilute voter representation in Oklahoma.
State Question 836: A Trojan Horse
Jonathan Hewitt - Substack
Analysis of State Question 836 and why it poses a threat to Oklahoma's electoral integrity and voter representation.
My Take on SQ836 Open/Jungle Primaries
C. Swearingen - Substack
Personal analysis and perspective on State Question 836 and the proposed jungle primary system for Oklahoma.
Don't California Our Oklahoma with a Top-Two Primary
OCPA Think Tank
Analysis of how California's top-two primary system has impacted their electoral process and why Oklahoma should avoid the same mistakes.
California & Washington Disprove SQ 836 Claims
OCPA Think Tank
Evidence from states with jungle primaries shows they don't moderate politics as proponents claim.
Jeff Starling Opposes Jungle Primary
Tulsa Today
Local elected official explains why the jungle primary system would harm Oklahoma's electoral process.
Constitutional Concerns with SQ 836
Oklahoma Constitution
Legal analysis of potential constitutional issues raised by the proposed changes to Oklahoma's primary system.
Senator David Bullard Comments on Open Primaries
Oklahoma Senate
State Senator shares concerns about the proposed open primary system and its impact on Oklahoma voters.
UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE
